CPTI upper left, New MDA upper right, legacy MDA lower right, digital MD lower left.
A discrete supercell tracked out of the Oklahoma Panhandle into southwest Kansas from 2120Z to 2220Z on 5/23/19. During the first portion of this loop, the mesocyclone detection algorithms had a very difficult time latching on to one dominant meso, plotting up to four separate IDs for the same storm. Eventually, both the legacy and new meso algorithms resolved one primary circulation, while the digital version continued to jump around a bit with the ID number and location. For the last 15 min. of this animation, the MDA data completely dropped out. The main point here is it was nearly impossible to utilize this product operationally because of the meso identification and data dropout issues. It’s worth a mention that the legacy and new MDAs had about a 15-20 min. window of good meso tracking after the consolidation to one ID and before the data was lost. -Roy

















It uses a surface temperature of 63F, and a surface dew point of 50F, both more than 10 degrees below the nearby observations. These inaccurately low values give, as one would expect, no sign of instability (CAPE=0). Looking at the modified NUCAPS gives a different picture, however.
In the modified sounding, the surface temp is 69, and the dew point is 65, which is much closer to the observed surface obs. This changes your surface-based CAPE to 2055 J/kg, vs. 0 from the unmodified. It also has a sharper low level inversion, which one wood expect based on the stratus deck in place.
Sure enough, the mesoanalysis shows CAPE at around 2000 J/kg. Clearly, this is another case where the modified NUCAPS sounding is a noticeable improvement over the unmodified sounding.

