Today marks the final testing day of the 2026 Satellite Proving Ground. It has been an illuminating week for myself – a pun we’ll get back to in a second. But first, some serious business. The Satellite HWT has proven to be a beneficial experience for a multitude of reasons. Foremost of those is the opportunity to test and help shape development on a whole new generation of satellite-based forecaster tools. But one shouldn’t discount the benefit that comes from the process, the collaboration, and the chance to work with scientists one might not get to meet otherwise. For me at least, this collaboration has been the most satisfying part of the week. A sincere thanks to the organizers, developers, and other forecasters who have made this week such a treat.
Ok, now back to the pun. This has been an illuminating week testing out five different satellite-based tools. The one tool that I haven’t shared imagery from this week is the SZA azimuth-corrected imagery. There’s a simple reason for that: it is designed to increase the visibility of day-cloud satellite products in low light scenarios around daybreak and dusk. The actual experimental time for this project is from early-to-late afternoon across the CONUS. Not exactly an ideal time.
So with that in mind, one of the first things I did today was to check in on SZA imagery from off the coast this morning. This side-by-side comparison of Day Cloud Phase between SZA and non-corrected imagery shows how powerful of a tool this could be.
Figure 1: SZA-corrected Day Cloud Phase (left) and non-corrected imagery (right) over the Atlantic Ocean early this morning
It’s one thing for Day Cloud Phase to gain more definition in the updraft/anvil pinks right at daybreak. That is valuable, but only so much. We already kind of know what’s happening at that level. The forecaster can benefit so much more from increased brightness right by the surface, where dynamic processes and even the texture of the clouds can help us discern so much.
I spent most of today as the “warning operator” at the Topeka simulated WFO. This meant I wasn’t experimenting with satellite products as much as I was testing how they could be used in warning operations to increase confidence in severe impacts from a thunderstorm. Invariably, my real-life operations rely on Day Cloud Phase as just one of the best products to detect vertical motion trends within convection. There are multiple forms of Day Cloud Phase that one can use within this experiment. I am particularly intrigued by MesoAnywhere’s ability to level the playing field, so to speak, when Mesoscale sectors aren’t available for the GOES satellites. Unfortunately, I did not proof the gif pulled off of AWIPS to try and demonstrate that point, and it is not time-matched between different products.
Figure 2: A gif that I did not realize was going to be frame-unmatched showing the three different types of Day Cloud phase available without a meso sector
The products that we tested this week all have the potential to enhance operations in the NWS. I look forward to reviewing them with my colleagues in the weeks to come.
Sabrina Carpenter
