ProbSevere vs. LJDA

One of our primary goals today was to examine the relationship between the ProbSevere model and the lightning jump detection algorithm. A strong storm fired on the front range of the Rockies, just west of Denver. The ProbSevere model noted strong satellite growth rates in a moderately-sheared environment, with MESH only 0.17″. The probability of severe was 33% at 1920 UTC.  At this time the PGLM indicated a flash rate on the order of 6 flashes per minute.  Two minutes later, at 19:22 UTC, the ProbSevere was 46%, as MESH increased to 0.33″, and the total flash rate at 8 flashes per minute per pixel.   Over the next 4 minutes, two consecutive lightning jumps were indicated in excess of 2 sigma as the total flash rate rose from 8 to 20 flashes/min/pixel (2 sigma jump at 1922 UTC, 4 sigma jump at 1924 UTC).  ProbSevere increased to 66% at 19:24, and 77% at 19:26 (MESH = 0.71″).  This storm intensity information highlighted the rapidly developing updraft within the storm; signalling the potential for severe weather was increasing as the first storm in the area approached the Denver Metro Area.The NWS issued a severe thunderstorm warning at 19:36 UTC. The jump in ProbSevere (46% to 66% from 19:22 to 19:24 UTC) and the 2-sigma and 4-sigma jumps from the LJA (at 19:23 and 19:24 UTC, respectively) may be able to give forecasters enhanced confidence and perhaps more lead time to initial rapid development in the storm, and potential severe hazards. Animated GIFs for Flash Extent Density (top), Lightning Jump Detection Algorithm (middle), and ProbSevere (bottom) from 1920 UTC to 1930 UTC can be seen below.

FED_CO LJA_CO CO

Additional lightning jumps were noted at 1943 UTC (3 sigma) followed by multiple 2 sigma jumps at 2000 UTC, 2001 UTC, and 2004 UTC, and another 3 sigma jump at 2005 UTC.  These additional jumps were additional signals that the updraft in the storm was re-intensifying and continued to have the potential to produce severe weather.  Thus any warning that was issued should remain in effect. During this time period, ProbSevere remained at or above 98%. The first tornado report associated with this storm was at 2005 UTC and hail to the size of golf balls were reported in the Denver Metro.  Also hail depth of at least 5 inches was reported at Denver International.

In this case, ProbSevere and LJDA both displayed the rapid intensification of the updraft, and could be especially useful in identifying the first severe storm of the day, and the maintenance of the ProbSevere and additional lightning jumps continued to highlight the threat of severe weather as the storm continued eastward as the storm propagated eastward.  This information is a high temporal resolution (1-2 minutes) and provides additional data points that can fill gaps between radar volume times.

-JC,CS,BW

 

Overshooting Top batting 1 for 3. 2145Z

May21st 2011Z-1

May 21st 2111Z-2

Here i Just wanted to show that the overshooting top with Cirrus both thick and thin does have some problems. In this case the system appears to be batting 333. Or 1 for 3 attempts.

The 1st attempt was a complete miss for a cluster that had developed in a clearing over southeast Lincoln county. In all fairness this cluster may have not quite been fully developed yet, but did become the dominate cell of the group.

the 2nd Attempt was a hit for a cluster passing through southwest Lincoln county and southeast Elbert County.

The 3rd attempt is a false positive for central Elbert county.

Grant H.

Tags: None

Lightning Jump Picking up on Reorganization

light_jump_21_22

Comparison of the Lightning Jump Detection Algorithm and the radar representation near 22Z is indicating that the once well organized Denver storm may be getting stronger again. Both on the 200 and 600km indicated a 2 sigma increase and the radar presentation now has a well defined BWER associated with the storm indicating better organization.

-JB

Will CI verify?

At 2130Z, the CI product indicated a 90% probability of convective initiation in Lawrence County, IN.

2130Z_Vis_CIBelow is a loop of KIND 0.5Z between 2123Z and 2156Z.

2123Z-2156Z_KIND_refNothing had appeared radar as of this writing but I am waiting with anticipation….

~Linda

Tags: None

Probability of Severe

prob_svr_4_pan

Above you have a 4-panel of MRMS with ProbSvr in the upper level and MRMS rotational shear in the lower level and MESH in the lower right. It is The southwest part of the 99% area is interesting here. Radar presentation would indicate that the area of the storm complex in the southwest is not severe, and MESH only indicates hail up to .3 to .4, but yet the area is still indicated at a 99% of severe. The output indicates that it is a mature storm. I am wondering if it is indicating a larger area than is necessary because it is a mature storm?

-JB

Tags: None

Evolution of the Denver International Airport(DIA) cell. NearCast PW use.

Before: 2028ZMay21st 2028Z

After: 2116Z

May21st 2116Z

So, here I wanted to show that often time the evolution of a storm environment can rely on how much moisture it is ingesting.  The Nearcast PW analysis in the exists in the upper right of both of these images. In the first image it shows a very narrow area of elevated PW to the north feeding into the storm early on with less moisture to the south. All this while the storm was in discrete mode. The second image shows the storm linearising out and spreading south. Along this newly developing line… a wall of higher PW has now appeared in the Nearcast analysis.

Grant H.

Tags: None

Laps 20Z Run

 

Laps 20Z Run

 

I decided to check out the Laps 20Z run to see if it was performing better than the previous runs.  As you can see from the maximum base reflectivity (bottom right) it is way over done especially with storms south of Parke County.  There are no storms there on actual radar (top left).  Not confident with this product today. ~Vollmar

Tags: None

LAPS CAPE

LAPS instability shows a detailed view of the instability to the south of I71.  Storm structure evolution indicates weakening hail and tornado threats, but a strong wind threat will continue as long as the storms have warm, unstable air to propagate towards.  LAPS stability products also show weaker stability in the washed over atmosphere where previous convection has occurred.  Training convection moving into this environment is not as likely to become severe.

21May2014-0000Z-LAPSCAPE

– JRM

Tags: None

NearCast for IND

Today, none of the NearCast products are usable in or around the IND CWA other than the storms appear to be lining up in and around potential areas of maxima for instability and moisture. Therefore, a fair assessment cannot be made with the theta-e or PW difference products.

PW_diff theta-e_diffIs there a way improve these products by potentially interpolating where there is missing data? Although that may not be feasible given the rather large areas that lack data across much of the center of the country.

~Linda

Tags: None