Summary – 23 April 2008

The first few hours of the day was spent training Patrick Burke and Angelyn Kolodziej with an archived PAR case. As would a WFO participant would do, they provided feedback on the case, compared the output to KTLX data, and filled out a survey. At the same time, I was testing out new fixes on the gridded warning software. Most of the bugs have been resolved, but a few remain and seem attainable before actual operations begin next Monday.

Our Intensive Operations Period (IOP) went from 5-8pm. During this time, we collected PAR data on a non-tornadic supercell which developed about 20-30 miles south of Norman:

We also loosely operated the gridded warning project over a number of domains, including Central Oklahoma, one a supercell NE of Midland TX, and a large bow echo complex that moved from west of FTW into the DFW metroplex. During this time, I was still testing the software for various bugs, and found one remaining issue that appears we can have fixed soon. Mike Magsig and Patrick Burke operated the software during this time. After the IOP, we had a great discussion from Patrick’s warning forecaster perspective on how probabilities currently factor into his warning decision making. He will be adding his thoughts to this blog in the next day or two.

Greg Stumpf (EWP Weekly Coordinator, 21-25 April)

Tags: None

Outlook – 23 April 2008

A Moderate Risk over SW OK and NW TX.

A strong upper level system is moving into the Plains, with split flow. A subtropical stream will affect Texas from the South Plains across the I-20 corridor into the DFW area. Deep layer shear is expected to improve with time. Further north, a secondary area under the influence of the main trough circulation across the CO/NE High Plains is another possible area. There is also going to be enough instability to set off storms in Central OK today although the shear is expected to be too weak for a tornado threat. Therefore, we intend to operate both PAR and gridded warning experiments today with our four “guest” forecaster/evaluators (Burke, Scharfenberg, Kolodziej, Magsig). The first few hours will be devoted to 1) PAR archive case feedback, and 2) gridded warning software debugging. The IOP from 5-9pm will concentrate on live PAR data collection, and a floating gridded warning domain, most likely over Texas.

Greg Stumpf (EWP Weekly Coordinator, 21-25 April)

Tags: None

Summary – 22 April 2008

Storms developed along the “stationary” front in eastern OK and western and NW AR today, and we concentrated our gridded warning efforts on an IOP from 5-9pm.

Mike Magsig (WDTB) played the forecaster/evaluator role today for the gridded warning experiment and he spent considerable time issuing gridded warnings. From the technology standpoint, a change to the contour code to sync warning times to specific products was working, but there were some side effects that caused some partially drawn warnings to disappear before they could be finished and saved. From the science standpoint, Mike spent a lot of time concerned with how to define the initial threat areas in relation to various storm structure elements. This was his first time to actually issue gridded probabilistic warnings, and it was good to finally give him some experience given that many of the ideas behind the concepts were his. At a few times, the warning grids we saved were not actually representative of the meteorology as we were trying to hammer the software issues, so these portions of this case might be “flagged” if used in future evaluation.

Here’s several screen captures during one moment in time during the IOP.

Storms did not form within 150 km of Norman, and thus we did not have a concerted PAR data collection (i.e., no real-time evaluation), although the radar was running in “long-range” mode throughout today’s event.

Greg Stumpf (EWP Weekly Coordinator, 21-25 April)

Tags: None

Outlook – 22 April 2008

Looks like mainly a severe hail event for the southeastern 1/3 of Oklahoma. A cold front moved through Norman this morning, and has stalled about 40 miles to the southeast of Norman.

Already at 3pm CDT, a severe thunderstorm watch has been issued for the warm sector. Low-level and deep-layer shear is marginal today, but there will be plenty of instability today with CAPE approaching 4000 J/kg in the warm sector this afternoon. Therefore, severe hail is the primary concern today.

We plan to operate the PAR and gridded warning experiments today. The PAR data collection will not be restricted to an IOP. However, we will concentrate our gridded warning IOP to 5-9pm. Before then, there are a number of gridded warning issues we need to take care of, including testing the archive case to get it ready for forecaster training. There are also some software fixes to the simulation time sync issues that may be ready today for testing, and we need to hammer on those, probably concentrating on only one or two storms at a time.

Greg Stumpf (EWP Weekly Coordinator, 21-25 April)

Tags: None

Summary – 21 April 2008

The cap held in Oklahoma until just before sunset today, when the leading edge of a moisture surge, seen as a westward-moving boundary, collided with the dryline. A supercell developed in western Garvin County and tracked slowly eastward, calving off at least one significant left-split that raced off to the northeast. We tested out the gridded probabilistic warning software today on these two storms (the left- and right-moving pair). There were still a few issues with regarding to time syncing of the various products, and the current threat area grids are still sometimes missing from the one-minute grid updates. Otherwise, the new storm motion-tool worked well and I was able to keep up with the two storms with not much difficulty. I issued and maintained high probability hail warnings for each storm, as well as a very low-probability tornado warning on the right mover. Here are a few images taken from WDSSII.

We also ran the Phased Array Radar (PAR) in TSS mode (Temporal Sensitivity Study) during the life time of the storms. The storm was moving slow enough to afford us the option of collecting a “half sector” 45 degrees wide. An image:

There were no CASA operations, as the storms were outside of the radar network.

Greg Stumpf (EWP Weekly Coordinator, 21-25 April)

Addendum:

Here is an image of the storm from outside of the NWC around 8 pm CDT:

A view of the 20080421 Storm from the NWC

Also, we had the Situational Awareness Display (SAD) operating. Here’s an example of how this might look:

Situalional Awareness Display during first

Kevin Manross (Backup EWP Weekly Coordinator, 21-25 April)

Tags: None

Outlook – 21 April 2008

This is the first day of operations during our shakedown week. Because we don’t have any visiting forecasters this week, and we are still prepping the various systems for next week, we are going to attempt to run all three experiments today. Normally, the gridded probabilistic warning experiment would not run if there were Central Oklahoma storms affecting the PAR and CASA domains.

Looking at the 1630 SPC DY1 outlook, there is one SLGT RISK area, but two different regimes, north versus south. Basically, the southern part of the risk area is highly conditional as there is a very strong cap over Oklahoma. A dryline/cold front triple point has set up near Elk City, and there could be enough convergence to overcome the capping inversion. If storms develop, they have the potential to be high-end hailers for several hours. There is also a small chance for tornadoes, however, the shear isn’t the best. Mesoscale accidents might be the rule to squeeze out a tube or two. The northern part of the SLGT RISK area is more likely to see convective initiation before 02 UTC.

So, for today, we intend to start our Intensive Operations Period (IOP) at 5pm. The gridded warning experiment will focus on the areas E-KS and W-MO, but because this is a shakedown week, our domain may “float”. If storms develop in Oklahoma, we will initiate PAR and CASA operations as well, and possibly move the gridded warning operations to the same domain. If this event were to happen during a non-shakedown week, gridded warning operations would cease as PAR and CASA operations would begin, provided the cap breaks.

From 2-5pm, we continue to test systems and get things ready. If this were a non-shakedown week, this time would be spent training visiting forecasters on the systems and running archive case playback.

Greg Stumpf (EWP Weekly Coordinator, 21-25 April 2008)

Tags: None

And Away We Go?

This is the eve of our first operational “shakedown” day for the EWP 2008 Spring Experiment. Are we ready? Heck no! But we’re pretty close. This is the reason for the shakedown week – to iron out any remaining kinks in the system. It also our buffer week to get some of our remaining tasks completed, like the individual experiment plans, and our ideas on how we are going to conduct our daily map discussions and post-event debriefings. The equipment in the HWT operations area is just about ready to go, and most of the mess is finally cleaned up. This is the very first year we are attempting something on this scale, so we feel it will be a work-in-progress, with hopefully much of the work completed by the end of this week.

So, what does the weather look like for the week? A nice progressive trough will move across the nation’s mid-section. Gulf moisture is also starting to make an impressive return Sunday night, and should be nicely in place for several events this week. Monday may see the potential for storms in OK/KS/MO, with a potential sleeper event for Central or North-Central Oklahoma. Could it be a PAR/CASA day, or a gridded probabilistic warning day? We’ll know for sure after our first daily meeting/map discussion tomorrow.

Greg Stumpf (EWP Operations Coordinator)

Tags: None

This Site is Under Construction…

During the final weeks before operations, we are working hard to get all the hardware, software, and manuals ready for the spring experiment.

Here are Paul Griffin and Brian Schmidt finishing the installation of the Situation Awareness Display (SAD) The SAD will consist of 7 large LCD monitors that will provide images from any of the other EWP computer monitors, as well as live television, web page content, etc. These LCD monitors will be mounted above the desks in two areas of the HWT. This picture shows the main part of the SAD, our 5 monitor tower, located on the west side of the HWT operations area.

Greg Stumpf (EWP Operations Coordinator)

Tags: None

Shakedown!

We begin our first of two shakedown weeks at the EWP on Monday April 14.

The first shakedown week (14-18 April) will be conducted “loosely”, with no set schedule, as we make sure all the technologies and systems are in proper working condition. We’ll also use some of the time to train our weekly coordinators on the various systems.

The second shakedown week (21-25 April) will be conducted in the same manner and using the same schedule as an actual operations week, except with NSSL participants and some of the weekly coordinators only. During the second shakedown week, we will start to post our daily post-mortem blog entries. Watch for them beginning 21 April 2008!

Greg Stumpf (EWP Operations Coordinator)

Tags: None

Welcome to the EWP Blog

Here is where we will update participants and other interested parties on news and events regarding the 2008 Experimental Warning Program (EWP) spring experiment being hosted at the NOAA Hazardous Weather Testbed. The experiment will run for six weeks from 28 Apr 2008 through 6 June 2008. Operations will occur every Monday through Thursday of each of the six weeks. Weekly coordinators will provide a daily summary on this blog with some pictures and images of important events worked. An end-of-week blog summary will also be provided, and it will contain feedback from the forecaster participants. In addition, other news and events will be posted to this blog as they occur.

Greg Stumpf (EWP Operations Coordinator)

Tags: None