Tracking Tool, Lightning Jumps and Storm Evolution

dc_jump_ex4

souuthern_jump

Above are two examples using the Tracking Meteogram tool and Flash Initiation Density to build flash rates of two individual storms near Washington D.C.    Rapid increases in total lightning signalled the onset of storm intensification in both cases, and multiple lightning jumps were observed as each storm developed and moved across the DC and Baltimore Metro areas. Hail to the size of golfballs was observed in the top storm with the first 1 inch hail reports falling at 1939 UTC.  At the time of this post, the southern storm produced hail to the size of quarters at 2035 UTC.

Chris S.

 

Tags: None

Some times you just have to sit back and laugh.

May22nd 2038Z

So some of this may have been AWIPs 2 some of this may have been alternate issues.

Chris was behind me as we were researching the LJDA components to things. When we noticed the one minute CG data disappeared…. then the 5 minute CG data disappeared. However the LJDA maps/shape files continued to work.  Whalla! a 5 and 6 sigma jump occurred successively over 2 minutes. It was time to warn.

So, I went over to radar base products on another CAVE windows to issue the warning over the base all tilts reflectivity.  Loaded Warngen to find that the old radar display controls from yesterday were still controlling the flow of the storms today 240 when I wanted roughly 320. I immediately attempted to to change the flow and redraw the box. Except now the box refused ro redraw in the southwest direction and immedately insisted on the northwest direction…. fine I’ll attempt to track the ball backward and force a redraw of the box in that direction…. Done. Who Hoo… that wasn’t  hard.

then i went to redraw the verticies….. after clicking on the first vertex the whole screen proceeds to move on me. … “Maybe I missed it” goes through my mind…. and click again…. “nope missed again”… click again…. “okay this is not cool”.  So, I permanently right click down to find a window to edit the vertices. “YAY alternative.”  Next I discover that the one vertex I’m moving is now permanently attached to the mouse icon….. “GAAAHAHHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!”

As i step back and look at it, someone out there of importance could be dead right now. But in this case I’d like to think it was Barney… Because personally I want that fat purple dinosaur to die. Thankfully this is an experiment and i’m happy nobody died… except for that awful singing dinosaur.

Grant H.

 

 

 

 

Tags: None

When I decided to issue a warning

Prob and Lightning

As the storms to began to break out, I used the prob severe tool in combination with the total lightning initiation and total lightning extent and lightning jump and based on how they all came together, I felt comfortable issuing the warning.  About 15 minutes later, golf ball size hail was reported so with this particular t’storm these products did well together. ~Vollmar

Tags: None

Lightning Jump

Lightning Jump

I finally got to see lightning jump data and it was so helpful.  At this frame you can it has the brown color and then as I continued the loop it went to a green color.  It indicated to me that this storm was intensifying and definitely got my attention.  It also was trending up on the Prob Severe so at this point I would probably issue a warning. ~Vollmar

Tags: None

Negating false positive/problems from larger LJDA scales.

May22nd 0009Z

With the image above I just wanted to show that sometime the LJDA can combine storms and trigger a larger sigma warning than seems realistic. Especially when the storms seem to barely touch on radar. In this case it was a 2-3 Sigma jump in Yellow which would prep the forecaster to think about warning.

This false positive can be fixed by overlaying a smaller scale LJDA over a larger one to potentially split the storms and break the sigma back down to a more realistic approximation that would not trigger a reason for warning (after suspecting it to be a false positive).

Grant H.

 

Tags: None

Total Lightning to forecast strengthening storm

lightning data

 

I have been watching the Total Lightning product over the developing storm and it shows both flash initiation density and flash extent density that have been increasing over the last 30 minutes.  That coupled with the increase on the Prob Severe, would lead me to believe this is nearing severe limits and I would then issue a warning.  I really like these products because it shows where the updraft is developing and also where hail would be found. ~ Vollmar

Anvil Flashes in PGLM

circle_2148UTC2552_fed_anvil_wnldn

Here are two examples (2148 UTC and 2153 UTC) in northeast CO of how PGLM can be used to detect flashes that propagate long distances into the anvil of storms.  Above is 0.5 km reflectivity, with flash extent density (FED; colored boxes) and NLDN strokes (minus signs).  The highest concentration of flashes is near the updraft core (42 flashes min per pixel), however, note how the flash extent extends well into the anvil region of the storm.  This highlights a region where lightning potential exists.  In the top panel, two NLDN flashes occur in the circled area and in the bottom panel, extensive anvil flashes are noted, but no NLDN information exists in the region where the PGLM shows flash propagation.

Chris S.

Tags: None

ProbSevere vs. LJDA

One of our primary goals today was to examine the relationship between the ProbSevere model and the lightning jump detection algorithm. A strong storm fired on the front range of the Rockies, just west of Denver. The ProbSevere model noted strong satellite growth rates in a moderately-sheared environment, with MESH only 0.17″. The probability of severe was 33% at 1920 UTC.  At this time the PGLM indicated a flash rate on the order of 6 flashes per minute.  Two minutes later, at 19:22 UTC, the ProbSevere was 46%, as MESH increased to 0.33″, and the total flash rate at 8 flashes per minute per pixel.   Over the next 4 minutes, two consecutive lightning jumps were indicated in excess of 2 sigma as the total flash rate rose from 8 to 20 flashes/min/pixel (2 sigma jump at 1922 UTC, 4 sigma jump at 1924 UTC).  ProbSevere increased to 66% at 19:24, and 77% at 19:26 (MESH = 0.71″).  This storm intensity information highlighted the rapidly developing updraft within the storm; signalling the potential for severe weather was increasing as the first storm in the area approached the Denver Metro Area.The NWS issued a severe thunderstorm warning at 19:36 UTC. The jump in ProbSevere (46% to 66% from 19:22 to 19:24 UTC) and the 2-sigma and 4-sigma jumps from the LJA (at 19:23 and 19:24 UTC, respectively) may be able to give forecasters enhanced confidence and perhaps more lead time to initial rapid development in the storm, and potential severe hazards. Animated GIFs for Flash Extent Density (top), Lightning Jump Detection Algorithm (middle), and ProbSevere (bottom) from 1920 UTC to 1930 UTC can be seen below.

FED_CO LJA_CO CO

Additional lightning jumps were noted at 1943 UTC (3 sigma) followed by multiple 2 sigma jumps at 2000 UTC, 2001 UTC, and 2004 UTC, and another 3 sigma jump at 2005 UTC.  These additional jumps were additional signals that the updraft in the storm was re-intensifying and continued to have the potential to produce severe weather.  Thus any warning that was issued should remain in effect. During this time period, ProbSevere remained at or above 98%. The first tornado report associated with this storm was at 2005 UTC and hail to the size of golf balls were reported in the Denver Metro.  Also hail depth of at least 5 inches was reported at Denver International.

In this case, ProbSevere and LJDA both displayed the rapid intensification of the updraft, and could be especially useful in identifying the first severe storm of the day, and the maintenance of the ProbSevere and additional lightning jumps continued to highlight the threat of severe weather as the storm continued eastward as the storm propagated eastward.  This information is a high temporal resolution (1-2 minutes) and provides additional data points that can fill gaps between radar volume times.

-JC,CS,BW