Storm Top Divergence During Low Topped Storms

Storms in the area this afternoon were mainly low-topped supercells with neutral values of speed (green) with a weaker sheared environment. The main thing that was noticeable was the threshold for CTD was not very strong with the storms this afternoon in the area (Figure 1). Thus, adjustments were made to the colorbar maximum thresholds with CTD for each smoothing technique (see Figure 2). The highest smooth CTD is normally 4, so it was maintained. Meanwhile, the medium smooth CTD was lowered to 3 as the colorbar maximum value and the regular CTD (non-smoothed) colorbar maximum was lowered to 2. The intensity of CTD becomes more notable in the lower thresholds, which may be needed/more helpful in these low-topped storm modes where the updrafts and cloud tops are not going to be near as cold (higher in altitude) as other convective modes. More research may be needed to look into whether the storm that originally created subtle CTD values (before the adjustment to the colorbar) ended up going on to become severe and/or produce hazardous weather. Therefore, local calibration may be needed by offices when it comes to different convective modes.

Figure 1: OCTANE Speed/Direction and CTC/CTD.

Figure 2: OCTANE Speed/Direction and CTC/CTD with adjusted colorbar maximum values for CTD across all smoothing levels.

Lightning cast V1 showed slightly lower probabilities than V2 for the convective initiation mentioned above.

Figure 3: Lightning cast V1 (left) and V2 (right) with GLM Flash Extent Density and Day Cloud Phase Distinction RGB.

– Aurora Borealis

Tags: None

Gremlin-EMESO 4 Panel

Noticed a very interesting Jump in the Gremlin products reflectivity near Hughes County (upper lefthand panel) which matched up very well with the cooling cloudtops (lower lefthand panel) which to me signals at least a short term strengthening trend in that specific cell within the clusters of storms in northeastern Oklahoma. Given the environment across the area this could lead me to at least consider a warning if not issue a warning for that cell.

– StingJet

Tags: None

GREMLIN and Low Topped Convection

GREMLIN seemed to really struggle with the low topped convection in the ILX CWA today. Our group was wondering if this was because there didn’t seem to be as much lightning activity.

About 30-40 minutes later, it seemed to recover some. Could this be because the convection was more established?

– Lightning McQueen

Tags: None

Utilizing OCTANE to Determine Failed Convection

Typically forecasters will utilize cloud top cooling and glaciation for an initial look into convective initiation. OCTANE cloud-top cooling clearly depicts the rapid intensification of an updraft with the quick change of colors (green to red). However, the OCTANE divergence component of this product helps to signify mature convection and a strong persistent updraft. Notice how there is no signal for cloud-top divergence (CTD) in the animated loop below (Figure 1). No signature for CTD and warming cloud-top temperatures became an apparent signature for failed convection.

Figure 1: OCTANE cloud-top cooling and divergence. Notice a rapidly developing updraft initiating south of the cluster of storms before it quickly warms as the storm fails to maintain strength.

Lightning cast clearly signifies a low probability for convection developing south of the main cluster. Additionally, day cloud phase distinction reveals an orphan anvil present in the storm that showed a quick signal for cloud-top cooling in the OCTANE product. Thus, failed convection led to no signal for a storm at the base reflectivity scan on radar.

Figure 2: Lightning cast V1 (left) and V2 (right), along with GLM Flash Extent Density and Day Cloud Phase Distinction RGB.

Figure 3: Local radar KILX base reflectivity at 0.5 degree tilt.

– Aurora Borealis

Tags: None

OCTANE Cloud-Top Cooling Prior to Hail Report

OCTANE detected appreciable cloud-top cooling prior to a 1.25” hail report in Mississippi County, Arkansas. This cloud-top cooling indicated a strengthening updraft, which can be associated with an increasing hail threat in a favorable environment. The most substantial cooling rate was approximately at 2005 UTC, which was 14 minutes prior to the hail report at 2019 UTC.

2005 UTC Image of OCTANE Cloud-Top Cooling and Divergence 14 minutes Before Hail Occurrence

– Vrot

Tags: None

DSS messaging with the Lightningcast Dashboard

While doing the DSS for our event in Memphis (the Memphis Firework Preview Show 2) noticed a rather quick uptick in the Lightning V2 and eventually V1 probabilities about 45 mins or so prior to lightning strikes occurring near and around the site. This would give valuable lead time to any partner that was concerned about an outdoor event. It was made slightly easier to have confidence in this decision to mention an increased lightning threat especially looking at the line in satellite and on radar data.

– Sting Jet

Tags: None

Gremlin-EMESO 4 Panel

Noticed a very interesting Jump in the Gremlin products reflectivity near Hughes County (upper lefthand panel) which matched up very well with the cooling cloudtops (lower lefthand panel) which to me signals at least a short term strengthening trend in that specific cell within the clusters of storms in northeastern Oklahoma. Given the environment across the area this could lead me to at least consider a warning if not issue a warning for that cell.

– StingJet

Tags: None

LightningCast Dashboard

Being this was my first time using the Dashboard, It took me a minute to figure out what I was looking at and which was V1 vs V2. But I believe the green line was V2, and it performed comparatively to yesterday in that it was quicker to react to the threat.

– Lightning McQueen

Tags: None

LightningCast and GREMLIN Identifying Threats Fast w/ OCTANE Being Great with Initiation

LightningCast seems to be doing its job quite well as it honed in on a small area in southeast KS with ample lead time (2042Z with more strikes appearing at 2056Z west of Jasper). This would be extremely useful for event deployments and getting ample lead time for our partners as seen below.

Regarding GREMLIN, it does a spectacular job identifying CI along boundaries (in this case, the dryline), somewhat ahead of time compared to MRMS reflectivity.

In this case, it appears to have picked up on more robust CI well ahead of time in TOP’s area. However, it does not appear to be super consistent later on with really capturing how robust some of these cells ended up later on, likely due to overall resolution of the product as well as lightning activity as these cells matured.

Lastly, regarding OCTANE, it did a great job on picking up a cell with ample cooling initially (reds and yellows) followed by strong divergence aloft (purples and pinks). This storm would go on to further intensify down the road.

This cluster of storms would then go on to produce multiple 60mph+ severe gusts.=

– Ryan Cooper

Tags: None

GREMLIN vs MRMS vs Z

When initially digging into the GREMLIN product (since I had never seen or worked with it before), I wanted to see how it looked in comparison to reflectivity products that I use daily. Loading a 4P with MRMS RALA in the top left, GREMLIN in the top right, and KTLX/KSRX base reflectivity in the bottom left and right, respectively, helped me visualize the differences. One thing I noticed is that the GREMLIN product had an odd jump in dBZ into Okfuskee County at 19:50Z Mon 19-May-25 that was not reflected by the base reflectivity products. This appears to be because GREMLIN’s view is from the top down rather than the top up, so it’s sampling more of the lightning in the anvil blowing off downstream to the north, causing an apparent downstream jump in reflectivity. I think this would be useful in anticipating where downstream convection is going to grow based on the lightning presence and anvil presentation on the satellite view with GREMLIN.

– millibar

Tags: None