Activities cenetered on the central Oklahoma High Risk area today, with both teams using a Norman (OUN) localization. Unfortunately, the OK-LMA network was down, and we were unable to do an analysis of the pseudo-LMA product. The two teams first sectorized between two supercells north of I-40 ( the westernmost storm being the V2 storm). Later, as convection developed south of I-40, the sectors were repositioned to be one for the north of I-40 storms, and one for the south of I-40 storms. All told, our teams issued 71 experimental warnings or severe weather statements today.

For the GOES-R products, one of the main comments from this event is that they all felt the proxy products from the current GOES satellites isn’t doing justice to the expected capabilities of GOES-R with increase temporal and spatial resolution. For example, there were fewer overshooting top detections that one forecaster would have expected. The CI products worked a little better today owing to less cirrus obscuration. There is a lot more information about this in the GOES-R HWT Blog daily summary.
The forecasters are gaining even more familiarity with the MRMS products. One comments noted that it is nice to be able to look at just one multi-radar product (e.g., 50 dBZ Echo Top) rather than having to figure it out from the many single radars and all-tilts sampling. Once again, they are discovering that the tracks products (hail and rotation) add a lot of value in determining at a glance both the storm motion (and very stable) and the storm intensity trends. They also found that the MESH was doing a good job at matching the actual reports, but that the bias-corrected MESH as under-doing the estimates by 1/4-1/2″.
Greg Stumpf (EWP2010 Operations Coordinator)