SYNOPSIS – A broken line of thunderstorms lifted north through SE Colorado in a weakly sheared, high LCL environment with modest instability (1000-2000j/kg MUCAPE) and high DCAPE (1000+ j/kg). This environment appears to favor pulse severe potential, with primarily a gusty/damaging wind risk.

OPERATIONAL NOTES AND FEEDBACK – Using GREMLIN and Lightning Cast Together

I used a 4-panel to compare GREMLIN, satellite, radar, MRMS, and LTG Cast data. I’ve not typically used LTG Cast to nowcast the severity of convection, but when combined with GREMLIN, it kind of reminds me of looking for signals in model data. For the most sustained convection, for example, GREMLIN had a fairly consistent signal of 40-50dBZ echoes in tandem with consistently high LTG probabilities. In the past, I’ve typically just focused on GLM lightning data on its own separate from LTG probs. Overlaying LTG Cast probs with GLM data seems to provide a more uniform / smoothed view of the evolution of lightning within convection as opposed to using GLM on its own. GLM can be jumpy at times, which can give the impression that a thunderstorm is weakening. However, if LTG cast probabilities remain high, it may give the forecaster more confidence that a thunderstorm is not weakening. This seemed to be the case with multiple different thunderstorms in SE CO today.

OPERATIONAL NOTES AND FEEDBACK – GREMLIN

It was interesting to note how closely the increase and decrease in GREMLIN reflectivity was tied to the increase and decrease in lightning. The developers noted that this is to be expected. Since GLM data can sometimes be jumpy, and isn’t always reflective of the severity of a storm at a given moment in time, it might be interesting to see if there is a way to offset this. Perhaps there is some way to mesh GLM data with Lightning Cast data (reference the notes in the observation section about nowcasting convective strengths) or through some other means (longer averaging time, etc.). When GLM data isn’t jumpy, GREMLIN seemed to compare very nicely with MRMS. But, when GLM data was jumpy, GREMLIN seemed to struggle some, showing more rapid increases and decreases in reflectivity that what MRMS showed. As an alternative, I could see where simply overlaying LightningCast data on top of GREMLIN data could provide a more “smoothed” and uniform trend in convection over time, in a way that could still provide useful information for warning decisions.

From an operations standpoint, GREMLIN seemed to provide a great overview of convective evolution, especially when overlaid with LightningCast data. It’s possible this could translate to warning decisions, but this initial runthrough with the product suggests its biggest advantage may be nowcasting the general evolution of convection as opposed to making specific warning decisions. Admittedly this is my first use of the product, and I’m looking forward to trying it in future days of the HWT to see if anything different stands out.

– NW Flow