Click for loop. You can see updrafts go up and goes along with the increase in lightning on the PGLM.
Jason Williams
Real-time posts made during testbed nowcast and warning operations.
Over the past 15 minutes, we’re starting to get some reflectivity to fire west of Denver.
Interestingly, the CI product never flagged those (the exception would be the northernmost cell near Rustic). I wonder if it’s because the clouds had been festering for quite some time and thus never flagged them because it thought they had already initiated. Before 2000z, there was no reflectivity showing up (again, exception is the northernmost cell).
Jason Williams
Discussion with meteorologist in the Cheyenne group had us look at the LAP PWAT product and compare it to the arc and area of clouds to its east to see how well they lined up. Indeed, GOES PWAT showed an area of considerably higher PWATs bulging west. It even did a fantastic job with the gradient. I have PWATS from 12z and 18z, showing the westward progress and then the gradient tightening as it approaches the mountains.
Jason Williams
Looks like we have an arc of subsidence just to the west of a westward-moving cloud field in our central CWA. The cu field is a bit less robust just west of said cloud field.
The animation below (click to view) helps show it. For navigation, look from about Cheyenne to Denver.
Its impact on storm development remains to be seen. Once again, we have a feature that would have been less apparent in anything less than rapid scan operations.
Jason Williams
CI on GOES-E had a cloud with a 68% chance of CI at 1823z; GOES-W did not have this. Using the topographical readout in AWIPS the elevation in that area is about 6000-8500 feet. The BOU NEXRAD did not show any echoes in its lowest tilts. That particular cloud element does not appear to have grown, per the 1min vis imagery.
Jason Williams