Starting to see more discrete circulations that are most likely very shallow and probably too small to be well resolved at much greater range than this. The example suggests utility in having the NMDA and NTDA icons displayed together because in this situation they’re basically identifying the same features while bringing different information to the table.

For example, the NMDA is looking at the 0.5 through 1.3 cuts while the NTDA uses multiple moments (including dual pol) at the 0.5 cut and then draws upon a set of a analogs to calculate probabilities. Using the NMDA/NTDA in this fashion is sort of like using a “two model ensemble” to build confidence in detections.

-marfafront