pGLM products in the mid-Atlantic 26 May 2011

Forecasters conducted warning operations in the Sterling, VA and State College, PA CWAs, which allowed for analysis of the pseudo-GLM products (from the DCLMA). Although the earliest convection initiated along and just west of the Appalachian Mountains (out of range of the LMA), storms soon formed within range. Isolated storms initiated and developed rapidly ahead of the main line. The pseudo-GLM products detected IC flashes ~10 min prior to the first CG flashes in two of these storms. These storms continued to intensify and eventually merged into a line, further increasing the flash rates.

2116 UTC 26 May 2011. pGLM flash rate and NLDN lightning, low-level vorticity track (3D-Var), 60 min max MESH track, reflectivity at -10 C.

As the discrete cells merged into a line, flashes remained frequent, and the pseudo-GLM products helped confirm the strength of individual cells within the line. Greater flash rates also helped identify areas of new convection as they formed along the line.

2317 UTC 26 May 2011. pGLM flash rate (bright) and 60 min Max Track (shadowed), reflectivity at -10 C, 60 min max MESH trackk, 60 min updraft track from 3D-Var.

Forecasters also observed that the pseudo-GLM swaths (i.e., 60 min sum of flashes) helped to illustrate persistent cells and identify the most intense portions of the line.

2336 UTC 26 May 2011. 60 min sum of pGLM flashrate, 120 Updraft track from 3D-Var analysis, 120 min Low-level (<3km) Vorticity track, 60 min MESH maximum track

The above screen captures illustrate several four panel displays used to compare individual products in AWIPS. The pseudo-GLM products often were plotted alongside the 3-D Var updraft and vorticity tracks, as well as the multi-radar multi-sensor hail swaths and reflectivity at -10 C.

Scott Rudlosky (pGLM scientist, week 3)

Tags: None