{"id":8763,"date":"2014-05-19T18:02:40","date_gmt":"2014-05-19T23:02:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/hwt.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/internal\/blog\/?p=8763"},"modified":"2016-10-03T17:53:17","modified_gmt":"2016-10-03T22:53:17","slug":"a-comparison-update","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/2014\/05\/19\/a-comparison-update\/","title":{"rendered":"A Comparison Update"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Looking forward two hours at the simulated IR\/WV imagery versus observed (and remaining focused near the WY\/NB border), the spatial placement is fairly good but intensity continues to be overdone. Here&#8217;s a snapshot at 22Z:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2014\/05\/22Z_Sim_Ob_Compare.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-8764\" alt=\"22Z_Sim_Ob_Compare\" src=\"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2014\/05\/22Z_Sim_Ob_Compare.png\" width=\"1698\" height=\"852\" srcset=\"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2014\/05\/22Z_Sim_Ob_Compare.png 1698w, https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2014\/05\/22Z_Sim_Ob_Compare-300x151.png 300w, https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2014\/05\/22Z_Sim_Ob_Compare-768x385.png 768w, https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2014\/05\/22Z_Sim_Ob_Compare-1024x514.png 1024w, https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2014\/05\/22Z_Sim_Ob_Compare-500x251.png 500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, (max-width: 1200px) 60vw, 720px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>As aforementioned, the simulated product provides some confidence in where to remain situationally aware but does not give confidence if taken strictly at face value when taking the overall picture into consideration.<\/p>\n<p>~Linda<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Looking forward two hours at the simulated IR\/WV imagery versus observed (and remaining focused near the WY\/NB border), the spatial placement is fairly good but intensity continues to be overdone.&#8230; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/2014\/05\/19\/a-comparison-update\/\" class=\"more-link\">Read more \u00bb<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":75,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8763","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8763","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/75"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8763"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8763\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":13733,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8763\/revisions\/13733"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8763"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8763"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8763"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}