{"id":787,"date":"2009-06-01T11:27:38","date_gmt":"2009-06-01T16:27:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/hwt.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/internal\/blog\/?p=787"},"modified":"2009-06-01T11:27:38","modified_gmt":"2009-06-01T16:27:38","slug":"monday-june-1-2009-hwt-outlook","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/2009\/06\/01\/monday-june-1-2009-hwt-outlook\/","title":{"rendered":"Outlook – 1 June 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"

SHORT:\u00a0 Most likely IOP will be for multi-radar\/multi-sensor product evaluation along frontal boundary in C. Iowa and E Nebraska during the 5-9 PM timeframe.\u00a0 PAR and CASA operations are not anticipated today.<\/p>\n

LONG:\u00a0 The strong northerlies are still north of the border in Canada, but thankfully there is enough moisture around to at least get deep moist convection in the CONUS.\u00a0 A weak vorticity max (weak even for early June standards) will move NE out of the 4-corners region, helping to increase low-level moisture across the central plains.\u00a0 At 1600 UTC quasi-stationary front was draped across C Nebraska, C Iowa and S. Wisconsin\/N. IL.\u00a0 The warm sector south of the boundary should remain mostly clear and with dewpoints in the low 60s should be more than enough CAPE to get things going today in that area.<\/p>\n

\"1600<\/a>
1600 DSM Surface Obs<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Depth of low level mosture is of some concern in terms of overall risk of severe weather and the threat of more than just gusty outflow winds.\u00a0 There is a fair amount of moisture aloft, leading to PWATs around 1.5 inches across NE and IA, and just above the shallow moist layer there is a stout EML.\u00a0 Along the surface boundary storms should form in the early evening hours right around peak heating and have a decent chance of becoming severe with good threat of severe hail (assume 1 inch criteria) and straight line winds.\u00a0 Wind shear is marginal in the area near and south of the surface boundary, with ~30-35 kts 0-6 km bulk shear.\u00a0 Low level shear and helicity are low everywhere, thus tornadic threat from supercells would be small.\u00a0 Near the surface boundary would still need to be monitored however and locally enhanced helicity\/low level shear could be present.\u00a0 Primary storm mode would be quasi-linear with bowing segments and perhaps 1 or 2 embedded supercell-like structures.\u00a0 Here are the SPC convective outlooks issued 1300 UTC:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>
Day 1 Outlook: Issued 1300 UTC<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n
\"\"<\/a>
Day 1 HAIL Probabilities<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n
\n
\"Day<\/a><\/dt>\n<\/dl>\n
\"Day<\/a>
Day 1 Tornado Probabilities<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

The boundary is expected to lift a little north throughout the evening until\/unless reinforced by convection.\u00a0 Though very unlikely, there is at least a VERY small chance things might fire south into Western Oklahoma so will need to keep an eye on that area in case something gets going, but the threat of severe weather is pretty slim even if storms do form.<\/p>\n

Next update will be during the live briefing in the NSSL dev. Lab, ~130 PM.<\/p>\n

Paul Schlatter and <\/span><\/em>Liz Quoetone (EWP Weekly Coordinators, 1-5 June 2009)<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

SHORT:\u00a0 Most likely IOP will be for multi-radar\/multi-sensor product evaluation along frontal boundary in C. Iowa and E Nebraska during the 5-9 PM timeframe.\u00a0 PAR and CASA operations are not… <\/p>\n

Read more \u00bb<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":86,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-787","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-outlooks"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/787","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/86"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=787"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/787\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=787"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=787"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=787"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}