{"id":20975,"date":"2024-05-09T11:56:15","date_gmt":"2024-05-09T16:56:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/?p=20975"},"modified":"2024-05-09T11:56:15","modified_gmt":"2024-05-09T16:56:15","slug":"thursday-morning-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/2024\/05\/09\/thursday-morning-case\/","title":{"rendered":"Thursday – Morning Case"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/p>\n

I noticed when putting out my initial tornado warning, that TORP was highlighting a circulation slightly southwest of the more apparent circulation. Not sure if this is due to some setting I had toggled on, but I was a bit shocked to see that TORP did not highlight an area of very strong rotation.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Throughout this case, I did notice that divshear did a phenomenal job at detecting and highlighting circulations off shore. There were several times that I was made aware of a circulation from both the Az and Div Shear products before velocity. \"\"<\/p>\n

There was one instance where Az and Div Shear swayed my warning decision. The above image shows that in reflectivity, a beam blockage kept imagery relatively weak. However, the Az and Div shear products are highlighting an area offshore. Because I saw this, I was inclined to investigate my SRM product, which showed strong rotation. I found this to be a very useful instance of the tools working to influence decision making.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

-Fujitareno<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

I noticed when putting out my initial tornado warning, that TORP was highlighting a circulation slightly southwest of the more apparent circulation. Not sure if this is due to some… <\/p>\n

Read more \u00bb<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":137,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-20975","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20975","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/137"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=20975"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20975\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":20984,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20975\/revisions\/20984"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=20975"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=20975"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=20975"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}