{"id":20641,"date":"2024-05-06T15:22:39","date_gmt":"2024-05-06T20:22:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/?p=20641"},"modified":"2024-05-06T15:22:39","modified_gmt":"2024-05-06T20:22:39","slug":"monday-test-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/2024\/05\/06\/monday-test-case\/","title":{"rendered":"Monday Test Case"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-20661\" src=\"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2024\/05\/torp1-900x506.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"900\" height=\"506\" srcset=\"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2024\/05\/torp1-900x506.png 900w, https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2024\/05\/torp1-1800x1012.png 1800w, https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2024\/05\/torp1-768x432.png 768w, https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2024\/05\/torp1-1536x864.png 1536w, https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2024\/05\/torp1-2048x1152.png 2048w, https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2024\/05\/torp1-600x338.png 600w, https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2024\/05\/torp1-2400x1350.png 2400w, https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2024\/05\/torp1-1200x675.png 1200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, (max-width: 1200px) 60vw, 720px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Having a way to just see the highest TORP probability triangle when multiple radars are selected would be beneficial (without having to manually deselect radars).<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-20663\" src=\"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2024\/05\/divshear1-900x691.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"900\" height=\"691\" srcset=\"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2024\/05\/divshear1-900x691.png 900w, https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2024\/05\/divshear1-1800x1382.png 1800w, https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2024\/05\/divshear1-768x590.png 768w, https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2024\/05\/divshear1-1536x1179.png 1536w, https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2024\/05\/divshear1-600x461.png 600w, https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2024\/05\/divshear1.png 1820w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, (max-width: 1200px) 60vw, 720px\" \/> <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-20662\" src=\"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2024\/05\/azshear1-900x691.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"900\" height=\"691\" srcset=\"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2024\/05\/azshear1-900x691.png 900w, https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2024\/05\/azshear1-1800x1382.png 1800w, https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2024\/05\/azshear1-768x590.png 768w, https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2024\/05\/azshear1-1536x1179.png 1536w, https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2024\/05\/azshear1-600x461.png 600w, https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2024\/05\/azshear1.png 1820w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, (max-width: 1200px) 60vw, 720px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>In the above screenshots, a damaging tornado was occurring. The strongest AzShear was within the Tornado PHI circle, but the strongest DivShear was not. In this case, the tornado was obvious from velocity data, but in marginal cases this could possibly lead to some confusion in where to focus attention.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-20667\" src=\"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2024\/05\/vrot-900x506.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"900\" height=\"506\" srcset=\"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2024\/05\/vrot-900x506.png 900w, https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2024\/05\/vrot-1800x1012.png 1800w, https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2024\/05\/vrot-768x432.png 768w, https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2024\/05\/vrot-1536x864.png 1536w, https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2024\/05\/vrot-2048x1152.png 2048w, https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2024\/05\/vrot-600x338.png 600w, https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2024\/05\/vrot-2400x1350.png 2400w, https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2024\/05\/vrot-1200x675.png 1200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, (max-width: 1200px) 60vw, 720px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Vrot according to the TORP for this storm was only 33 (not shown here). Turns out this is in m\/s and not kts which is more accurate, though kts would be preferred. Either way, the units being displayed would be helpful.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-20684\" src=\"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2024\/05\/time_series.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"525\" height=\"423\" \/><\/p>\n<p>The time series charts are helpful for maintaining situational awareness throughout a storm&#8217;s life cycle and knowing what values are extreme, low, etc.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Having a way to just see the highest TORP probability triangle when multiple radars are selected would be beneficial (without having to manually deselect radars). In the above screenshots, a&#8230; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/2024\/05\/06\/monday-test-case\/\" class=\"more-link\">Read more \u00bb<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":137,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-20641","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20641","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/137"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=20641"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20641\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":20691,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20641\/revisions\/20691"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=20641"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=20641"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=20641"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}