{"id":20071,"date":"2024-04-16T14:22:35","date_gmt":"2024-04-16T19:22:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/?p=20071"},"modified":"2024-04-16T14:22:35","modified_gmt":"2024-04-16T19:22:35","slug":"torp-vs-probtor-example","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/2024\/04\/16\/torp-vs-probtor-example\/","title":{"rendered":"TORP Vs. ProbTor Example"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>During the slow portion of our CWA being in three tornado watches (for a much longer time than one might think), we noticed a TORP object along a meager looking meso. Probabilities were relatively low sitting around 25% which we tended to agree with due to the lack of promising features among base radar products. And then we decided to entertain a look at the ProbTor model and found an estimate of 58% for the same meso. This was clearly blowing the probabilities out of the water and TORP was able to give us confidence in disregarding ProbTor&#8217;s input in this case.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_20077\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-20077\" style=\"width: 900px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-20077\" src=\"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2024\/04\/LowProbTORPKDMX-900x769.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"900\" height=\"769\" srcset=\"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2024\/04\/LowProbTORPKDMX-900x769.png 900w, https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2024\/04\/LowProbTORPKDMX-768x656.png 768w, https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2024\/04\/LowProbTORPKDMX-600x512.png 600w, https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2024\/04\/LowProbTORPKDMX.png 1219w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, (max-width: 1200px) 60vw, 720px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-20077\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Probability trends for TORP remained low for it&#8217;s detection of this mesocyclone.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<figure id=\"attachment_20078\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-20078\" style=\"width: 900px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-20078\" src=\"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2024\/04\/HighProbTorDMX-900x506.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"900\" height=\"506\" srcset=\"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2024\/04\/HighProbTorDMX-900x506.png 900w, https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2024\/04\/HighProbTorDMX-1800x1012.png 1800w, https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2024\/04\/HighProbTorDMX-768x432.png 768w, https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2024\/04\/HighProbTorDMX-1536x864.png 1536w, https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2024\/04\/HighProbTorDMX-2048x1152.png 2048w, https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2024\/04\/HighProbTorDMX-600x338.png 600w, https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2024\/04\/HighProbTorDMX-2400x1350.png 2400w, https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2024\/04\/HighProbTorDMX-1200x675.png 1200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, (max-width: 1200px) 60vw, 720px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-20078\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">ProbTor model ran a much higher probability than TORP for this mesocyclone.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>It&#8217;s nice to see even just one example of TORP trumping the aged ProbTor model.<\/p>\n<p>-Wx Warlock<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>During the slow portion of our CWA being in three tornado watches (for a much longer time than one might think), we noticed a TORP object along a meager looking&#8230; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/2024\/04\/16\/torp-vs-probtor-example\/\" class=\"more-link\">Read more \u00bb<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":137,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-20071","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20071","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/137"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=20071"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20071\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":20079,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20071\/revisions\/20079"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=20071"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=20071"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=20071"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}