{"id":18112,"date":"2019-06-05T15:19:41","date_gmt":"2019-06-05T20:19:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/?p=18112"},"modified":"2019-06-05T15:19:41","modified_gmt":"2019-06-05T20:19:41","slug":"ilx-upper-air-sounding-comparison-to-nucaps-and-modified-nucaps","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/2019\/06\/05\/ilx-upper-air-sounding-comparison-to-nucaps-and-modified-nucaps\/","title":{"rendered":"ILX Upper-Air Sounding comparison to NUCAPS and Modified NUCAPS"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/p>\n

Above is a special sounding released by the ILX office around 17z on June 5th, 2019. Below is the output for the NUCAPS and sequential Modified NUCAPS sounding from around the same time and as close to the same area as possible.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

The NUCAPS pass pictured above was primarily in a cloud-free environment behind an old outflow boundary to its south and ahead of a developing line of convection to its north. Visually, it tended to underdue the CAPE values in the environment, especially in the low to mid levels.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

The modified NUCAPS sounding (above) did show some skill in incorporating more accurate boundary layer conditions, which in turn, upped the CAPE values considerably (almost 2x in some cases). This brought the values into better agreement to the in-situ observation from NWS ILX with the exception of the SFC based CAPE which remained considerably underdone.<\/p>\n

—————————————————————————————————Mountain Bone<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Above is a special sounding released by the ILX office around 17z on June 5th, 2019. Below is the output for the NUCAPS and sequential Modified NUCAPS sounding from around… <\/p>\n

Read more \u00bb<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":136,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-18112","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18112","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/136"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18112"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18112\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18125,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18112\/revisions\/18125"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18112"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18112"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18112"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}