{"id":18018,"date":"2019-06-05T15:56:58","date_gmt":"2019-06-05T20:56:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/?p=18018"},"modified":"2019-07-08T13:58:04","modified_gmt":"2019-07-08T18:58:04","slug":"springfield-illinois-storms","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/2019\/06\/05\/springfield-illinois-storms\/","title":{"rendered":"Springfield Illinois Storms"},"content":{"rendered":"

Right now I’m analyzing the various new products to nowcast where and when storms will intensify. Currently I’m comparing ALLsky cape to the mesoanalysis from the spc. Right now the mesoanalysis is higher with cape compared to allsky. Over our area the it’s cloudy so the it’s taking data from the GFS.<\/p>\n

A cell in our western counties ramped up very quickly while our computers were down. Prob severe immediately directed our eye to the cell. The probsevere lined\u00a0 up with an uptick in vil values and velocity.<\/p>\n

\"\" I’m comparing the actual sounding to what’s shown on nucaps, and allsky to see what’s initializing the best. The actual sounding shows 3025kj of surface lavyer cape and 1453 of mixed layer.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Around the same time allsky shows a similar value of cape.<\/p>\n

The modified sounding was closest to the actual sounding with 1515kj of mixed layer cape<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

The nonmodified sounding is much lower when it comes to mixed layer and surface cape. In the case the modified sounding was more reliable and gave a more accurate picture of the current state of the atmosphere.
\n\"\"<\/p>\n

The all sky cape was much higher, around 2300kj.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

That increase might be due to the fact that the sampled area of interest was filled in by the GFS. Whatever input the GFS was taking into might have lead to it overestimating the amount of CAPE.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

I’m also looking at GLM products to see trends with convection. The combination of event density and GLM minimum flash area help me to see the rapidly growing updrafts as well as cell that are producing hail. That’s the case right now. My warned cell is producing penny size hail.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

About an hour later the FED Is starting to pick up on longer flashes, but the event density is still showing higher values. The lines up with satellite which shows overshooting tops, but storms are overall keeping their intensity. The overall trend combined with looking at stability indices aids me in nowcasting that storms will at least maintain their strength over the next hour or so.
\n\"\"<\/p>\n

The Day Land Cloud convection RGB was helpful in analyzing different cloud tops. The color scale highlighted the thin cirrus compared to the lower thick clouds. It also dipicted the outflow boundary from our southern storms very well. It gives much more detail to the cloud types compared to the visible satellite.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Today I also got the chance to analyze and compare the merged TPW precipital water with the allsky.<\/p>\n

During the afternoon the PW values stayed fairly steady across the northern half of the state while moisture increased in southern Illinois.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

The TPW decreased PWATS to close to 1 inch as storms moved through. T\"\"<\/p>\n

That data was sampled in a cloudy environment.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Meanwhile, the AllSky does show a decrease in PWATS but’s farther north compared to what actually happened. That data was pulled from the GFS since it was in a cloudy location. It was helpful to see how each product performed in this environment. It’s nice to have access to both in order to see which one has the best handle of the current atmosphere. That initialization helps me monitor trends and nowcast.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

As storms moved south out of my DMA I used Day convection RGB just to monitor growing cells. It was clear to see the strongest storms because they had the bright yellow maxes.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Earlier in the day was able to compare NMDA with the low level azshear. Tornadoes were’t a major threat, but the NMDA did line up with peak areas of Azshear. That storm did produce wind damage, and strong wind gusts.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Taylor Johnson.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Right now I’m analyzing the various new products to nowcast where and when storms will intensify. Currently I’m comparing ALLsky cape to the mesoanalysis from the spc. Right now the… <\/p>\n

Read more \u00bb<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":138,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[72,44,64,10,11,59,68,14],"tags":[50,54,52,55,45,35],"class_list":["post-18018","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allsky","category-azshear","category-glm","category-live-blogs","category-mesoscale-discussions","category-nmda","category-nucaps","category-probsevere","tag-all-sky-lap","tag-azshear","tag-glm","tag-nmda","tag-nucaps","tag-probsevere"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18018","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/138"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18018"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18018\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18194,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18018\/revisions\/18194"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18018"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18018"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18018"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}