{"id":16131,"date":"2019-05-07T15:26:55","date_gmt":"2019-05-07T20:26:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/?p=16131"},"modified":"2019-05-07T18:17:35","modified_gmt":"2019-05-07T23:17:35","slug":"big-bad-flash-or-bad-big-flash","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/2019\/05\/07\/big-bad-flash-or-bad-big-flash\/","title":{"rendered":"Big, Bad, Flash or Bad Big Flash"},"content":{"rendered":"

Everything was chugging along great with the GLM and the storms around Amarillo this afternoon as this image from 19:54 shows (TL – Flash Extent Density 5-minute w\/ 1-minute update with Vaisala GLD Data overlayed, TR – Minimum Flash Area with ENI Total Lightning overlayed, BL – Total Optical Energy with Vaisala NLDN overlayed, BR – IR\/VIS Sandwich):<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

But then the next set of data arrives at 19:55:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

So, that big white area showed up which is a 2918 km2<\/sup> area flash.\u00a0 WOW.\u00a0 THAT. IS. HUGE.\u00a0 But the question now becomes is that correct or not?\u00a0 Taking into account parallax and the data from the ground-based networks shows that there was electrical activity in the general area.\u00a0 However, it isn’t in the area that would line up with the parallax; the ground-based network data should be closer to the southeastern area of the flash.\u00a0 Also of interest is that there is no Flash Extent Density associated with the large flash but there is an associated area of Total Optical Energy.<\/p>\n

One thing we are tossing around here is the possibility of a cloud reflection; here is the 1-minute visible mesoscale scan with the big flashes overlayed:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

If there was indeed a flash at this time, the optical energy could have reflected from the originating area off the anvil, and then reflected back off the low clouds around the updraft to the GLM instrument.\u00a0 However, the fact that there isn’t any data associated with this flash in Flash Extent Density is concerning.\u00a0 Needless to say, the lightning scientists here are all going “Hmmmmmmm….”<\/p>\n

-Dusty<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Everything was chugging along great with the GLM and the storms around Amarillo this afternoon as this image from 19:54 shows (TL – Flash Extent Density 5-minute w\/ 1-minute update… <\/p>\n

Read more \u00bb<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":136,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,9,1,16],"tags":[52],"class_list":["post-16131","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-goesr","category-lightning-jump-algorithm","category-news","category-total-lightning","tag-glm"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16131","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/136"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16131"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16131\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16142,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16131\/revisions\/16142"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16131"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16131"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16131"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}