{"id":16098,"date":"2019-05-07T14:57:01","date_gmt":"2019-05-07T19:57:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/?p=16098"},"modified":"2019-05-07T18:20:18","modified_gmt":"2019-05-07T23:20:18","slug":"single-radar-vs-merged-azshear","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/2019\/05\/07\/single-radar-vs-merged-azshear\/","title":{"rendered":"Single-Radar vs Merged AzShear"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The 0-2km merged Azshear product showed multiple &#8220;hot spots&#8221; at the beginning of this particular storm. But which one is more important?\u00a0Below is what the\u00a0 merged AzShear looked like at 2023Z&#8230;<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-16099\" src=\"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2019\/05\/Screenshot-from-2019-05-07-19-42-43.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"954\" height=\"697\" srcset=\"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2019\/05\/Screenshot-from-2019-05-07-19-42-43.png 954w, https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2019\/05\/Screenshot-from-2019-05-07-19-42-43-900x658.png 900w, https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2019\/05\/Screenshot-from-2019-05-07-19-42-43-768x561.png 768w, https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2019\/05\/Screenshot-from-2019-05-07-19-42-43-600x438.png 600w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, (max-width: 1200px) 60vw, 720px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Without looking at velocity data you can&#8217;t really tell where the center of the storm is using the merged product. However, here is what the single-radar AzShear looked like around 2023Z&#8230;<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-16111\" src=\"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2019\/05\/Screenshot-from-2019-05-07-19-49-56.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"954\" height=\"699\" srcset=\"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2019\/05\/Screenshot-from-2019-05-07-19-49-56.png 954w, https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2019\/05\/Screenshot-from-2019-05-07-19-49-56-900x659.png 900w, https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2019\/05\/Screenshot-from-2019-05-07-19-49-56-768x563.png 768w, https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2019\/05\/Screenshot-from-2019-05-07-19-49-56-600x440.png 600w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, (max-width: 1200px) 60vw, 720px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>The single-radar AzShear clearly indicates that the southern couplet in the merged product was where center of the rotation was located. This clearly shows how single-radar can provide additional information in a warning situation.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The 0-2km merged Azshear product showed multiple &#8220;hot spots&#8221; at the beginning of this particular storm. But which one is more important?\u00a0Below is what the\u00a0 merged AzShear looked like at&#8230; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/2019\/05\/07\/single-radar-vs-merged-azshear\/\" class=\"more-link\">Read more \u00bb<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":137,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[44],"tags":[54],"class_list":["post-16098","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-azshear","tag-azshear"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16098","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/137"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16098"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16098\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16116,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16098\/revisions\/16116"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16098"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16098"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16098"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}