{"id":14962,"date":"2019-04-23T15:43:29","date_gmt":"2019-04-23T20:43:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/?p=14962"},"modified":"2019-04-30T19:26:06","modified_gmt":"2019-05-01T00:26:06","slug":"final-thoughts","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/2019\/04\/23\/final-thoughts\/","title":{"rendered":"Final Thoughts"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Overall &#8211; impressed by Inst AzShear.\u00a0 Think this could be a real game changer.\u00a0 Would like to see this fast tracked into AWIPS.<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>\u00a0When used in conjunction with other base and DP products &#8211; really supplements storm structure evolution &#8211; e.g. gust fronts, UDCZ, RFDs.<\/li>\n<li>Areas of highest values &gt; 0.01 are easy to see &#8211; and give forecasters an easy method to triage what storms need attention.<\/li>\n<li>Focused much of my time with Inst AzShear at 0.5 deg.\u00a0 Did tilt up on a number of occasions to find values near cloud base &#8211; and often times very similar to lowest cut.\u00a0 Would be interesting to see how this performs with mid-level mesos &#8211; for things like hail production<\/li>\n<li>Only real drawback I see is the &#8220;noisy&#8221; appearance to data &#8211; especially in areas of ground clutter, wind farms, etc.\u00a0 But I think forecasters would get used to it quickly.<\/li>\n<li>Merged products also useful &#8211; both individual and tracks &#8211; mainly from an SA perspective &#8211; trends, tracks of meso, polygonolgy, etc.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Overall &#8211; impressed by Inst AzShear.\u00a0 Think this could be a real game changer.\u00a0 Would like to see this fast tracked into AWIPS. \u00a0When used in conjunction with other base&#8230; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/2019\/04\/23\/final-thoughts\/\" class=\"more-link\">Read more \u00bb<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":137,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[44],"tags":[54],"class_list":["post-14962","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-azshear","tag-azshear"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14962","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/137"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14962"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14962\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14972,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14962\/revisions\/14972"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14962"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14962"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inside.nssl.noaa.gov\/ewp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14962"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}