Storm Top Divergence During Low Topped Storms

Storms in the area this afternoon were mainly low-topped supercells with neutral values of speed (green) with a weaker sheared environment. The main thing that was noticeable was the threshold for CTD was not very strong with the storms this afternoon in the area (Figure 1). Thus, adjustments were made to the colorbar maximum thresholds with CTD for each smoothing technique (see Figure 2). The highest smooth CTD is normally 4, so it was maintained. Meanwhile, the medium smooth CTD was lowered to 3 as the colorbar maximum value and the regular CTD (non-smoothed) colorbar maximum was lowered to 2. The intensity of CTD becomes more notable in the lower thresholds, which may be needed/more helpful in these low-topped storm modes where the updrafts and cloud tops are not going to be near as cold (higher in altitude) as other convective modes. More research may be needed to look into whether the storm that originally created subtle CTD values (before the adjustment to the colorbar) ended up going on to become severe and/or produce hazardous weather. Therefore, local calibration may be needed by offices when it comes to different convective modes.

Figure 1: OCTANE Speed/Direction and CTC/CTD.

Figure 2: OCTANE Speed/Direction and CTC/CTD with adjusted colorbar maximum values for CTD across all smoothing levels.

Lightning cast V1 showed slightly lower probabilities than V2 for the convective initiation mentioned above.

Figure 3: Lightning cast V1 (left) and V2 (right) with GLM Flash Extent Density and Day Cloud Phase Distinction RGB.

– Aurora Borealis

Tags: None

Utilizing OCTANE to Determine Failed Convection

Typically forecasters will utilize cloud top cooling and glaciation for an initial look into convective initiation. OCTANE cloud-top cooling clearly depicts the rapid intensification of an updraft with the quick change of colors (green to red). However, the OCTANE divergence component of this product helps to signify mature convection and a strong persistent updraft. Notice how there is no signal for cloud-top divergence (CTD) in the animated loop below (Figure 1). No signature for CTD and warming cloud-top temperatures became an apparent signature for failed convection.

Figure 1: OCTANE cloud-top cooling and divergence. Notice a rapidly developing updraft initiating south of the cluster of storms before it quickly warms as the storm fails to maintain strength.

Lightning cast clearly signifies a low probability for convection developing south of the main cluster. Additionally, day cloud phase distinction reveals an orphan anvil present in the storm that showed a quick signal for cloud-top cooling in the OCTANE product. Thus, failed convection led to no signal for a storm at the base reflectivity scan on radar.

Figure 2: Lightning cast V1 (left) and V2 (right), along with GLM Flash Extent Density and Day Cloud Phase Distinction RGB.

Figure 3: Local radar KILX base reflectivity at 0.5 degree tilt.

– Aurora Borealis

Tags: None

OCTANE Cloud-Top Cooling Prior to Hail Report

OCTANE detected appreciable cloud-top cooling prior to a 1.25” hail report in Mississippi County, Arkansas. This cloud-top cooling indicated a strengthening updraft, which can be associated with an increasing hail threat in a favorable environment. The most substantial cooling rate was approximately at 2005 UTC, which was 14 minutes prior to the hail report at 2019 UTC.

2005 UTC Image of OCTANE Cloud-Top Cooling and Divergence 14 minutes Before Hail Occurrence

– Vrot

Tags: None

LightningCast and GREMLIN Identifying Threats Fast w/ OCTANE Being Great with Initiation

LightningCast seems to be doing its job quite well as it honed in on a small area in southeast KS with ample lead time (2042Z with more strikes appearing at 2056Z west of Jasper). This would be extremely useful for event deployments and getting ample lead time for our partners as seen below.

Regarding GREMLIN, it does a spectacular job identifying CI along boundaries (in this case, the dryline), somewhat ahead of time compared to MRMS reflectivity.

In this case, it appears to have picked up on more robust CI well ahead of time in TOP’s area. However, it does not appear to be super consistent later on with really capturing how robust some of these cells ended up later on, likely due to overall resolution of the product as well as lightning activity as these cells matured.

Lastly, regarding OCTANE, it did a great job on picking up a cell with ample cooling initially (reds and yellows) followed by strong divergence aloft (purples and pinks). This storm would go on to further intensify down the road.

This cluster of storms would then go on to produce multiple 60mph+ severe gusts.=

– Ryan Cooper

Tags: None

OCTANE-GREMLIN Comparison for May 8th convection across eastern Tennessee

MesoAnywhere was very useful during this event. While there was a meso sector across the Tennessee valley, MesoAnywhere did a great job providing useful details pertaining to warning operations. Growing cu was evident early in the event along with mesoscale boundaries. The product continued to provide value during the event as other channels were used to measure storm intensity trends.

GREMLIN struggled early in the event with a storm just north of the CWA over Whitley County, Kentucky. This storm quickly became severe warned as there was a large Three Body Scatter Spike (TBSS) and impressive tall intense reflectivity core with ZDR/CC/KDP drop out. GREMLIN caught on I believe after 5min or so, but reflectivity values were still lower and not as concerning as MRMS. It was also interesting to note the storm entering western portions of the forecast area looked more intense on GREMLIN at times. If there was no radar data, GREMLIN may have made me focus more on issuing a warning for the storm to the west of the CWA. However, OCTANE data clearly showed a stronger STD signal on the storm to the north which is what made me initially go look at the 88D radar data for it.

GREMLIN was a useful tool during the event as it did catch on to stronger cells that developed, but it was slightly slower than MRMS or 88D radar data at times and would smooth out more impressive signals in reflectivity that helped issue timely severe warnings for hail. If there is no radar data, GREMLIN is certainly still a useful tool. The more tools, the better!

Here is where OCTANE data clearly showed a stronger STD signal on the severe storm to the north compared to the one entering our CWA from the west. This gave me a heads up to go look at the 88D radar data to see if a warning was warranted. The smoother STD procedures make it slightly easier to see the signal.

OCTANE STD has been one of my favorite tools in the experiment. I found it very useful to quickly identify the strongest storms in my CWA that warranted my attention. It was also helpful for understanding storm intensity trends as it has cloud top cooling overlaid in the product. The low-med smoothing and high smoothing were easier to read than the sn smoothing STD procedure. The no smoothing was splotchy which made it more difficult for my eyes to quickly discern which storms required the most attention for potential convective warnings. The tool was amazing for all of the convective events through the week, but I could see this procedure not being as useful in certain convective modes where STD signals may be weaker. I would love to learn more about what thresholds to look for in the product! I’m sure that will be a great future research project, and I appreciate all of the hard work from the researchers involved with this experiment.

– Ricky Bobby

Tags: None

Severe thunderstorm warnings ONLY using satellite data

May 8, 2025 was an interesting day for the experiment because “WFO GSP” was not allowed to utilize radar to issue severe thunderstorm warnings. I relied heavily on OCTANE Speed and CTD/cooling products and GREMLIN for making these decisions. At first, I struggled a bit with mentally shifting everything to the southeast due to parallax. After I began to utilize the ENTLN data as a proxy for storm core, it was better to estimate storm location and movement (although still not perfect). By the end of the day, I ended up issuing seven severe thunderstorm warnings. I found myself relying more on the CTD and cloud top cooling panel than the speed sandwich. Since it was my second day using the OCTANE products, I was quicker at picking up on signals in the CTD panel that suggest the presence of stronger thunderstorms. Having the CTD in one number compared to having to mentally calculate it while using the speed sandwich was helpful when working in simulated operations when a couple seconds does make a difference.  I also found GREMLIN useful as a situational awareness tool to help distinguish which cells should potentially be interrogated more.

Here is a loop of OCTANE Speed Sandwich and the CTD and CTC products from two severe thunderstorm warnings I issued. The severe thunderstorm warnings were issued for the same storm, with the second one being issued as the first one was expiring. Looking at the OCTANE data combined with ENTLN (Image 1), it was clear that the storm was taking a turn to the right.  I don’t know the specific values that CTD was showing, but I do believe this storm had values of 4+.

Image 1: Two severe thunderstorm warnings in OCTANE SS and CTD/CTC with Lightning Cast v1 and v2 overlaid. ~21:20Z to 21:56Z

GREMLIN (Image 2) also subtly shows this change in direction. What is interesting is that GREMLIN using ECONUS actually maxed out with a value of 60.4 dBZ.

Image 2: GREMLIN loop for the same two severe thunderstorm warnings in Image 1.

Image 3: Severe thunderstorm warning with OCTANE SS and CTD/CTC. ~21:56Z-22:22Z.

Image 4: Severe thunderstorm warning for the same time but with GREMLIN.

Another severe thunderstorm warning I issued, was showing CTD values of 4+ that prompted a warning. In GREMLIN, the strength of this cell was not as obvious in the ECONUS version, but slightly more prominent in EMESO-2. GREMLIN shows these cells basically merging, but I don’t know if that was reality. Looking at these loops compared to the movement of the lightning data, I don’t think my strom track was very good. In cases where radar is unavailable, I could see other novice warning forecasters also struggling with identifying storm track and motion when using strictly satellite data and also trying to mentally correct for parallax. This may not be an issue for more experienced warning operators though.

– Golden Retriever Lover

Tags: None

Greer Severe Weather Blog

From 1940Z to 1950Z, there was a cell developing right over Madison county. If you look at the cloud top temperatures in the Octane 4 panel below, you will see that there is cooling spike. Gremlin also picked up on high reflectivities in the same area with actual ENI total lightning increasing in density. Gremlin also showed an increased lightning intensity signal. We issued a warning on that storm and ¾ inch hail was reported.

2149Z

Interesting feature with Gremlin that would possibly suggest that there is a hook on the storm noted below to the right. Hence we issued a SVR with TOR possible tag. Looking forward to seeing if there are any reports with this storm.

-Jolly Rogers

Tags: None

GREMLIN and The Orphan Anvil

I experimented with GREMLIN for convective initiation on May 7, 2025. One feature that stood out and was briefly discussed amongst the developers and participants was an orphan anvil. The first animation below is the GREMLIN CONUS (bottom right), MRMS Composite Reflectivity (top right), and GOES-19 Channel 7 (bottom left) and the second animation is Day Cloud Convection overlaid with LightningCast.  As you follow the anvil passing south of the Home (or the Hot Pepper Festival), GREMLIN continues to project it as a storm or at least a shower further east. LightningCast did well and held steady and kept the lightning potential with a set of updrafts to the west.  Unfortunately, a meso-sector was not available at this time and thus could not compare the 1-minute data to the 5-minute data.  On a side note, the MesoAnwhere did fairly well depicting the orphan anvil progressing eastward.

Images above show the orphan anvil being projected eastward and suggested by GREMLIN as a storm/shower but MRMS has no reflectivity. The lack of lightning probably hurt GREMLIN in this scenario and it was suggested by a developer that anvil temperatures can resemble cloud tops and most likely confused GREMLIN in this scenario.

MesoAnywhere showing the orphan anvil.

– Podium

Tags: None

Tulsa Severe Weather Event

An upper low across central Oklahoma allowing for an unstable environment across the Tulsa CWA. At 19:38Z,  clearing noted across the western  half of the CWA allowing for cu development across this region. At this time, limited to only CONUS level satellite imagery as mesoscale sectors are elsewhere.

21:00, towers with anvils noted and are beginning to shear off of the updraft.

I felt that lightningcast overperformed in pinging on lightning that never transpired in real time.

-Jolly Rogers

Tags: None

Analyzing OCTANE and GREMLIN procedures for May 7th event over JAX forecast area

GREMLIN was doing relatively well early in the event capturing more intense cells firing up along the Sea Breeze boundary.

Some issues were then noted with new development along the boundary after initial cells began to collapse with convective cloud debris and leftover anvil overhang. GREMLIN hardly shows any reflectivity where MRMS shows new cells developing to the west of the more intense cell offshore.

GREMLIN struggled some with this cluster of storms further south as well, but it did do a great job of capturing the more organized cells.

The more intense cell shown in the GREMLIN figure above did intensify further with OCTANE products showing strong Storm Top divergence and shear. The speed sandwich showed nearly 40 knots of shear at this point and no smoothing STD had peak values near 5.5 10^-3 -s. The medium smoothing had values around 4-5 10^-3 -s. This was the strongest signature of the day and questions were raised on if a severe t-storm warning would be issued if there was no radar data. It is hard to answer this question given how new these Satellite products are to me. Knowing the environment was marginally supportive for downbursts or severe hail and this was the strongest signal of the day I may have issued a severe thunderstorm warning. It would have been a lower confidence warning, but it is better to be safe and issue the warning given there is no radar data theoretically.

A few scans later OCTANE products clearly showed the storm had already reached peak intensity and was beginning to weaken. Weakening storm top divergence/shear in speed sandwich along with weaker gradient in wind speeds were the signals noted. This would have given me the confidence to know another severe thunderstorm warning downstream was likely not needed. GREMLIN also showed reflectivities beginning to decrease around or shortly after this point providing greater confidence. Forgot to grab an image of GREMLIN for this.

– Ricky Bobby

Tags: None